![]() However, the jury in the courtroom - which is located just 15 minutes away from Apple's headquarters in California - thought otherwise, awarding close to the $380m Apple sought. "Apple doesn't own beautiful and sexy," Samsung lawyer William Price told the jury during the proceedings. Samsung had argued that Apple should not have ownership over technology like what Samsung said was the "basic rectangle" shape of smartphones. Continue reading the main story 'Beautiful and sexy' Samsung closed down slightly earlier in the day. In total, Apple has now been awarded close to $930m in the case.Īpple shares traded slightly higher on the news. The $290m figure comes on top of the $550m Samsung owes Apple as a result of the initial verdict. These are mostly older Samsung tablets and smartphones. The jury's ruling covers 13 of the 26 Samsung devices that Apple had argued copied its technology. "While it's impossible to put a price tag on those values, we are grateful to the jury for showing Samsung that copying has a cost." It has been about innovation and the hard work that goes into inventing products that people love. ![]() However, US District Judge Lucy Koh ordered a retrial because she said that jury miscalculated the amount Samsung must pay.Īpple said in a statement: "For Apple, this case has always been about more than patents and money. ![]() This verdict comes after a previous jury found Samsung owed Apple $1.05bn for patent infringement. Continue reading the main story Related StoriesĪ Silicon Valley jury has ruled that Samsung must pay $290m (£180m) to Apple for copying iPhone and iPad features in its devices. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |